Jayne v. Dennison
This text of 284 So. 2d 237 (Jayne v. Dennison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Frances Sharon JAYNE, Formerly Frances Sharon Dennison, Appellant,
v.
Calvin B. DENNISON, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*238 J. Thomas Wright, of Herce, Martinez & Associate, Tampa, for appellant.
Donald C. Evans and J. Ronald Wigginton, Tampa, for appellee.
COWART, JOE A., Jr., Associate Judge.
The appellant claims that every order changing custody must include a finding that the prior custodian is unfit. This is not correct. There need only be a substantial, material change of circumstances that strongly infers a change of custody would promote the welfare of the child. Negative factors in the mother's circumstances, short of unfitness, when coupled with intervening special needs of the child and increased ability of the father to provide for the child may be sufficient to justify a change. While unfitness is entitled to much weight, and is a factor often noted in the cases, it is not an absolute prerequisite to a change.
The appealed order is Affirmed.
MANN, C.J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 So. 2d 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jayne-v-dennison-fladistctapp-1973.