Jaylin's Properties, LLC v. Reginald Evans

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 2024
Docket24-1287
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jaylin's Properties, LLC v. Reginald Evans (Jaylin's Properties, LLC v. Reginald Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaylin's Properties, LLC v. Reginald Evans, (4th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1287 Doc: 12 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1287

JAYLIN’S PROPERTIES, LLC,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REGINALD EVANS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:23-cv-05605-JFA)

Submitted: July 25, 2024 Decided: July 30, 2024

Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick M. Killen, SHULER-KILLEN, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1287 Doc: 12 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Evans seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and remanding this case to state court due to a

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. With limited exceptions not applicable here, a district

court’s order remanding a removed case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not

reviewable on appeal or otherwise. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); see Doe v. Blair, 819 F.3d 64,

66-67 (4th Cir. 2016) (“[A] district court may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction at any time, and such an order is not reviewable.”) (citations omitted)).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id. at 66. We deny as

moot Appellee’s motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe Ex Rel. Houdersheldt v. Blair
819 F.3d 64 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jaylin's Properties, LLC v. Reginald Evans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaylins-properties-llc-v-reginald-evans-ca4-2024.