Jayjohn v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DANNY L. JAYJOHN, II, CASE NO. 2:20-CV-02977 Petitioner, CHIEF JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent. ORDER On June 23, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts recommending that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 3.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. A ? Zyl KZ ALGENONL. MARBLEY——— CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: July 21, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jayjohn v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution (Jayjohn v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.