Jaycap Financial, Ltd. v. Alfred Neustaedter
This text of Jaycap Financial, Ltd. v. Alfred Neustaedter (Jaycap Financial, Ltd. v. Alfred Neustaedter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-17-00680-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
JAYCAP FINANCIAL, LTD., Appellant,
v.
ALFRED NEUSTAEDTER, Appellee.
On Appeal from the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on an agreed motion to withdraw as counsel. A
dispute has arisen between appellant and counsel. Appellant’s counsel, R. Kyle Hawes,
David Medina, Keith C. Livesay, Katherine Petroski, David N. Calvillo, Chamberlain,
Hrdlica, White, Williams & Aughtry, P.C., and Livesay Law Office seek to withdraw. Appellant does not object to the motion to withdraw as counsel. We grant said motion.
Pursuant to Rule 6.5(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, counsel is directed to
notify appellant, in writing, of any previously undisclosed deadlines and file a copy of that
notice with the Clerk of this Court.
Appellant is directed to notify the Court promptly if he retains new counsel on
appeal by filing a notice including that attorney’s name, mailing address, email address,
telephone number, facsimile number, and State Bar of Texas identification number. See
generally TEX. R. APP. P. 6. It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed this the 10th day of May, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jaycap Financial, Ltd. v. Alfred Neustaedter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaycap-financial-ltd-v-alfred-neustaedter-texapp-2019.