Jay v. Greer

Indiana Supreme Court

Jay v. Greer

20 Ind. 70

DecidedMay 15, 1863

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ind. 70 (Jay v. Greer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jay v. Greer, 20 Ind. 70 (Ind. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit on a note. Answer, that by mistake the note was made to include too much; that is, interest on the account for which it was executed. Reply: denial. Other answers were filed, but the only error assigned is based upon the finding on the above issue. The evidence shows that a small amount of interest, accrued after the account had run six months, was included in the note. The account was for merchandize ordered. The purchaser was apprised that the seller dealt on six months time, and examined the account when he gave the note. We can not disturb the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed,, with five per cent damages and costs. . ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Suit on a note. Answer, that by mistake the note was made to include too much; that is, interest on the account for which it was executed. Reply: denial. Other answers were filed, but the only error assigned is based upon the finding on the above issue. The evidence shows that a small amount of interest, accrued after the account had run six months, was included in the note. The account was for merchandize ordered. The purchaser was apprised that the seller dealt on six months time, and examined the account when he gave the note. We can not disturb the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed,, with five per cent damages and costs. . ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ind. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jay-v-greer-ind-1863.