Jay T. Brown v. Deputy Constable John Glossip

920 F.2d 322, 1991 WL 24
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 10, 1991·No. 90-2316·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case, before us a second time, needs little if any attention. We need note only that under Shillingford v. Holmes, 634 F.2d 263 (5th Cir.1981), Brown’s allegations are sufficient to controvert Glossip’s qualified immunity defense. Consequently, the district court’s denial of Glossip’s motion to dismiss was entirely appropriate.

As a postscript, we add that our earlier opinion, Brown v. Glossip, 878 F.2d 871 (5th Cir.1989), should be interpreted as applying, consistent with Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 639, 107 S.Ct. 3034, 3037, 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987), the “clearly established” legal rules as of the date of Glossip’s actions.

The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jay T. Brown v. Deputy Constable John Glossip, 920 F.2d 322, 1991 WL 24 (5th Cir. 1991).

920 F.2d 322 (Jay T. Brown v. Deputy Constable John Glossip) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Debruzzi v. Kijakazi
S.D. California, 2023
State v. Darryl Bailey
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1998