Jay S. Spechler v. Victor Tobin

327 F. App'x 870
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJune 25, 2009
Docket09-10246
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 327 F. App'x 870 (Jay S. Spechler v. Victor Tobin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jay S. Spechler v. Victor Tobin, 327 F. App'x 870 (11th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jay S. Spechler appeals the dismissal of his five-count civil rights damages complaint, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Chief Judge Victor Tobin of Bro-ward County alleging violations of various liberty and property interests without due process of law, as well as other state law claims. These claims arose out of former county judge Spechler’s reassignment by the Chief Judge to a different judicial post, and Spechler’s resignation one day later, alleging that he had been “banished” to a satellite court office with a nonexistent docket.

The district court reviewed Spechler’s claims and determined that defendant is protected by qualified immunity because no violation of a clearly established constitutional right occurred, plaintiff does not have standing to pursue his claims, sovereign immunity protects defendant from the state law claims, and, in any event, they have no merit.

We have reviewed the pleadings, the record, and the district court’s order dismissing this case. Finding no error, we shall

AFFIRM.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 F. App'x 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jay-s-spechler-v-victor-tobin-ca11-2009.