Jay Richard Bergman v. United States
This text of 420 F.2d 681 (Jay Richard Bergman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was indicted for, then tried and convicted by the court of, a violation of the Universal Military Training & Service Act in refusing to be inducted into the Armed Forces of the United States as ordered by his Selective Service Board. He claimed 1-0 or, in the alternative, a II-A classification. He received I-A.
The scope of our review is limited to the question of whether there is a basis in fact for the classification received by appellant. His sincerity in making the 1-0 claim was in issue. The Board resolved that issue against him. Clearly, there was a basis in fact for the Board’s action.
On the II-A claim, the record supports our conclusion that there was a basis in fact for the Board’s decision that appellant failed to make a prima facie showing that he could not be replaced in his work.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F.2d 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jay-richard-bergman-v-united-states-ca9-1970.