Jay Nordstrom v. Robert Gordon D/B/A Stuttgart Auto Group
This text of Jay Nordstrom v. Robert Gordon D/B/A Stuttgart Auto Group (Jay Nordstrom v. Robert Gordon D/B/A Stuttgart Auto Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered December 16, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01288-CV
JAY NORDSTROM, Appellant
V.
ROBERT GORDON D/B/A STUTTGART AUTO GROUP, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-02276-C
ORDER By postcard dated October 8, 2014, we notified Court Reporter Janet Wright that the
reporter’s record in this case was overdue. We directed Ms. Wright to file the reporter’s record
within thirty days. To date, Ms. Wright has not responded. By letter dated November 18, 2014,
appellant Nordstrom notified the Court that he had “requested that the court reporter prepare the
reporter’s record and send the notice of cost.” Appellant also notified the Court that Ms. Wright
has failed to respond to his request.
Accordingly, we ORDER Court Reporter Janet Wright to file, within TEN DAYS of the
date of this order, written verification that appellant has not made payment arrangements for the
record. If payment arrangements have been made, we ORDER Court Reporter Janet Wright to file the reporter’s record within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this Order.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jay Nordstrom v. Robert Gordon D/B/A Stuttgart Auto Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jay-nordstrom-v-robert-gordon-dba-stuttgart-auto-g-texapp-2014.