Jay Jordan v. Ensco Incorporated, Ensco International Incorporated, Ensco Inc., Ensco Offshore Company, Ensco Offshore Drilling, Inc., Ensco Operating Company and Ensco Drilling Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 23, 2011
Docket14-10-01162-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jay Jordan v. Ensco Incorporated, Ensco International Incorporated, Ensco Inc., Ensco Offshore Company, Ensco Offshore Drilling, Inc., Ensco Operating Company and Ensco Drilling Company (Jay Jordan v. Ensco Incorporated, Ensco International Incorporated, Ensco Inc., Ensco Offshore Company, Ensco Offshore Drilling, Inc., Ensco Operating Company and Ensco Drilling Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jay Jordan v. Ensco Incorporated, Ensco International Incorporated, Ensco Inc., Ensco Offshore Company, Ensco Offshore Drilling, Inc., Ensco Operating Company and Ensco Drilling Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Reinstated; Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 23, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-01162-CV

JAY JORDAN, Appellant

V.

ENSCO INCORPORATED, ENSCO INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED, ENSCO INC., ENSCO OFFSHORE COMPANY, ENSCO OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC., ENSCO OPERATING COMPANY, and ENSCO DRILLING COMPANY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2004-45208

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 9, 2010.  On March 1, 2011, this court abated the appeal for a hearing to consider whether the missing portion of the reporter’s record is necessary to the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f).  On June 20, 2011, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because the case has been settled.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.  We grant the motion and order the appeal reinstated.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Brown, and Christopher.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jay Jordan v. Ensco Incorporated, Ensco International Incorporated, Ensco Inc., Ensco Offshore Company, Ensco Offshore Drilling, Inc., Ensco Operating Company and Ensco Drilling Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jay-jordan-v-ensco-incorporated-ensco-international-incorporated-ensco-texapp-2011.