Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 23-2136
Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Dat Tran, Acting Secretary - Department of Veteran Affairs
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
Stan Pietrusiak, Director of EEOC; A.G. Merrick B. Garland; Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
Submitted: September 14, 2023 Filed: September 19, 2023 [Unpublished]
Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Missouri resident Jay Ehrenfeld appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se employment discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Dalton v. NPC Int’l, Inc., 932 F.3d 693, 695 (8th Cir. 2019) (reviewing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) dismissals de novo); Said v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1 The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak (Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.