Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 19, 2023·No. 23-2136·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 23-2136

Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Dat Tran, Acting Secretary - Department of Veteran Affairs

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Stan Pietrusiak, Director of EEOC; A.G. Merrick B. Garland; Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

Submitted: September 14, 2023 Filed: September 19, 2023 [Unpublished]

Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Missouri resident Jay Ehrenfeld appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se employment discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Dalton v. NPC Int’l, Inc., 932 F.3d 693, 695 (8th Cir. 2019) (reviewing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) dismissals de novo); Said v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak, (8th Cir. 2023).

Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak (Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aaron Dalton v. NPC International, Inc.
932 F.3d 693 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)
Sameh Said v. Mayo Clinic
44 F.4th 1142 (Eighth Circuit, 2022)