Jawarski King v. Collection Acct. Co.
This text of Jawarski King v. Collection Acct. Co. (Jawarski King v. Collection Acct. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-20-00252-CV __________________
JAWARSKI KING, Appellant
V.
COLLECTION ACCT. CO., Appellee __________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 135,690 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The trial court signed a final judgment on November 5, 2020. Appellant
Jawarski King filed a notice of appeal but failed to file a brief. On February 19, 2021,
we notified the parties that the reporter’s record had not been filed because the
reporter’s fee had not been paid and that the appeal would be submitted on the clerk’s
record alone unless payment arrangements were made with the court reporter or a
motion explaining the need for additional time to file the record was filed.
1 On April 5, 2021, we informed the parties that the Court had received a notice
from the court reporter that, due to Appellant’s failure to pay for the record, no
reporter’s record had been filed, and we informed the parties that the case was
submitted on the clerk’s record alone and that Appellant’s brief was due on May 5,
2021. On May 18, 2021, we notified the parties that Appellant’s brief was past due
and had not been filed and the appeal would be submitted on the record alone unless
we received a brief and motion for extension of time by May 28, 2021, and we
warned Appellant that the failure to file a brief could result in dismissal of the appeal
for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
In the absence of a brief assigning error for appellate review, we dismiss the
appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); Tex. R. App. P.
42.3(b).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on July 28, 2021 Opinion Delivered July 29, 2021
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jawarski King v. Collection Acct. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jawarski-king-v-collection-acct-co-texapp-2021.