Jawarski King v. Collection Acct. Co.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 29, 2021
Docket09-20-00252-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jawarski King v. Collection Acct. Co. (Jawarski King v. Collection Acct. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jawarski King v. Collection Acct. Co., (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-20-00252-CV __________________

JAWARSKI KING, Appellant

V.

COLLECTION ACCT. CO., Appellee __________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 135,690 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court signed a final judgment on November 5, 2020. Appellant

Jawarski King filed a notice of appeal but failed to file a brief. On February 19, 2021,

we notified the parties that the reporter’s record had not been filed because the

reporter’s fee had not been paid and that the appeal would be submitted on the clerk’s

record alone unless payment arrangements were made with the court reporter or a

motion explaining the need for additional time to file the record was filed.

1 On April 5, 2021, we informed the parties that the Court had received a notice

from the court reporter that, due to Appellant’s failure to pay for the record, no

reporter’s record had been filed, and we informed the parties that the case was

submitted on the clerk’s record alone and that Appellant’s brief was due on May 5,

2021. On May 18, 2021, we notified the parties that Appellant’s brief was past due

and had not been filed and the appeal would be submitted on the record alone unless

we received a brief and motion for extension of time by May 28, 2021, and we

warned Appellant that the failure to file a brief could result in dismissal of the appeal

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

In the absence of a brief assigning error for appellate review, we dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 28, 2021 Opinion Delivered July 29, 2021

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jawarski King v. Collection Acct. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jawarski-king-v-collection-acct-co-texapp-2021.