Javna v. Small
This text of 178 A.D.2d 248 (Javna v. Small) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, of the Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, S.), entered May 28, 1991, which granted petitioners’ motion for summary judgment, and denied respondent’s cross-motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We affirm for the reasons stated by the Surrogate, and would add only that Singer v Jefferies & Co. (78 NY2d 76) relied on by respondent in support of her position that she did not waive her right to arbitrate, was decided under the Federal Arbitration Act (supra, at 84-85), and therefore is not controlling. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 A.D.2d 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/javna-v-small-nyappdiv-1991.