Javier Zamarano-Valdez v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 2026·No. 6D2026-0244·Published

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 6D2026-0244 Lower Tribunal No. 2009-CF-000367 _____________________________

JAVIER ZAMARANO-VALDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Highlands County. David V. Ward, Judge.

May 8, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005) (“[T]he Legislature, by

prescribing a sentence of life imprisonment, intends that the defendant remain in prison for the

rest of his life. The term ‘life’ is sufficiently definite so that it can be understood and applied.”).

SMITH, BROWNLEE and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur.

Javier Zamarano-Valdez, Chipley, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Javier Zamarano-Valdez v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Javier Zamarano-Valdez v. State of Florida (Javier Zamarano-Valdez v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ratliff v. State
914 So. 2d 938 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)