Javier Sobrevilla Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 12, 2019·No. 13-18-00602-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00602-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JAVIER SOBREVILLA JR., Appellant, v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the appellate record. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and appellant has been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has

the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before January 3, 2020, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 12th day of December, 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Javier Sobrevilla Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Javier Sobrevilla Jr. v. State (Javier Sobrevilla Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)