Javier Sang v. Brilliance Jewels
This text of Javier Sang v. Brilliance Jewels (Javier Sang v. Brilliance Jewels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 29, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1084 Lower Tribunal No. 21-21782-CA-01 ________________
Javier Sang, Appellant,
vs.
Brilliance Jewels, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.
The Davis Legal Center, Dameka L. Davis, (Hollywood), for appellant.
Darius Asly; Glenn R. Goldstein, for appellees.
Before SCALES, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Javier Sang appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint for
failure to prosecute per Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(e). We affirm without discussion
as to the dismissal itself but reverse in part to the extent the dismissal was
with prejudice. See Ehrlich v. Hogle, 393 So. 3d 1249, 1251 n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA
2024) (“A dismissal for failure to prosecute may not be entered with
prejudice.” (quotation omitted)).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Javier Sang v. Brilliance Jewels, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/javier-sang-v-brilliance-jewels-fladistctapp-2025.