Javier Rios Martinez v. State
This text of Javier Rios Martinez v. State (Javier Rios Martinez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00291-CR
JAVIER RIOS MARTINEZ, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 22614
ABATEMENT ORDER
On December 7, 2004, appellant, Javier Rios Martinez was charged with
intoxication assault with a vehicle causing serious bodily injury. See TEX. PENAL CODE
ANN. § 49.07 (West 2011). Pursuant to a plea bargain with the State, appellant pleaded
guilty to the charged offense. On December 5, 2005, the trial court accepted appellant’s
guilty plea, sentenced him to eight years’ imprisonment, suspended the sentence, and
placed appellant on community supervision for eight years. Subsequently, on December 2, 2013, the State filed a motion to revoke appellant’s
community supervision, alleging numerous violations. Presumably after a hearing, the
trial court determined that the allegations contained in the State’s motion to revoke were
true and thereafter revoked appellant’s community supervision and sentenced him to
eight years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice.
On October 1, 2014, appellant’s retained counsel, Rosalind Kelly, filed a notice of
appeal in this matter. The Clerk’s Record in this matter was filed on November 4, 2014.
Our records indicate that appellant’s counsel did not request that a copy of the Reporter’s
Record be filed in this Court; therefore, on January 12, 2015, we submitted this case on
the Clerk’s Record only.
On February 18, 2015, we informed Kelly that her brief in this matter was late. In
our February 18, 2015 letter, we noted that, unless a brief or satisfactory response is
received within fourteen days, we would abate this appeal and order the trial court to
conduct a hearing pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2)-(3). See TEX.
R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2)-(3). On March 4, 2015, Kelly filed a motion for extension of time,
requesting an additional sixty days to file her brief in this matter. We granted Kelly’s
motion.
When we did not receive a response from Kelly within sixty days, we sent another
late brief notice. In our May 15, 2015 letter, we once again informed Kelly that this case
would be abated for further proceedings in the trial court unless Kelly responded within
Martinez v. State Page 2 fourteen days. The deadline for Kelly’s response was May 29, 2015. To date, we have not
received a brief or response to our May 15, 2015 letter.
We hereby abate this appeal to the trial court to conduct any necessary hearings
within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this order pursuant to Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2)-(3). The trial court
clerk and court reporter shall file supplemental records within forty-two (42) days after
the date of this order.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal abated Order issued and filed on June 18, 2015 Do not publish
Martinez v. State Page 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Javier Rios Martinez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/javier-rios-martinez-v-state-texapp-2015.