Javier Gonzalez, Irma Gonzalez and All Occupants v. JMH Ventures, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 7, 2011·No. 02-11-00022-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00022-CV

JAVIER GONZALEZ, IRMA APPELLANTS GONZALEZ AND ALL OCCUPANTS

V.

JMH VENTURES, INC. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On March 9, 2011, we notified appellants that the trial court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that

arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).

We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. appellants, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record

and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellants shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 7, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Javier Gonzalez, Irma Gonzalez and All Occupants v. JMH Ventures, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Javier Gonzalez, Irma Gonzalez and All Occupants v. JMH Ventures, Inc. (Javier Gonzalez, Irma Gonzalez and All Occupants v. JMH Ventures, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.