Javier Esparza v. John Soto

Opinion

____________________________________ ) JAVIER ESPARZA, ) No. LA CV 14-00577-VBF-JPR ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ) v. ) Adopting the Report & Recommendation: ) JOHN SOTO (Warden of CSP-LAC), ) Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition; ) ) Directing Entry of Separate Judgment and Respondent. ) Terminating the Case (JS-6) ____________________________________ The Court has reviewed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254; the respondent warden’s answer memorandum and supporting documents (Doc 6); the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”); and the applicable law. Finding no error of law, fact, or logic in the Magistrate Judge’s well- reasoned Report and Recommendation, the Court will accept her factual findings and legal conclusions and implement her recommendation. The Report and Recommendation [Doc #63] is ADOPTED. The 28 U.S.C. section 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc # 1] and its supplement [Doc#49] are DENIED. 1 Final judgment consistent with this order will be entered separately as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). See Jayne v. Sherman, 706 F.3d 994, 1009 (9th Cir. 2013). The Court will rule on a certificate of appealability by separate order. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The case SHALL BE TERMINATED and closed (JS-6). ‘ Dated: November 20, 2020 lhleue Liber, (atedotahe: Hon. Valerie Baker Fairbank Senior United States District Judge