Javier Diaz-Bey v. Ron Havner

435 F. App'x 229
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 20, 2011·No. 11-1484·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Javier Diaz-Bey and Stephanie Shackle-ford appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Diaz-Bey v. Havner, No. 4:11-cv-00063-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Javier Diaz-Bey v. Ron Havner, 435 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2011).

435 F. App'x 229 (Javier Diaz-Bey v. Ron Havner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shackleford v. Diaz-Bey
181 L. Ed. 2d 988 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Parker v. Tim Lally Chevrolet
565 U.S. 1162 (Supreme Court, 2012)