Javier Diaz-Bey v. Ron Havner
This text of 435 F. App'x 229 (Javier Diaz-Bey v. Ron Havner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Javier Diaz-Bey and Stephanie Shackle-ford appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Diaz-Bey v. Havner, No. 4:11-cv-00063-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 F. App'x 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/javier-diaz-bey-v-ron-havner-ca4-2011.