Javier De La Rosa Jr. v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00748-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
ALICIA OLABARRIETA AND APPELLANTS, ADALBERTO OLABARRIETA,
v.
COMPASS BANK, APPELLEE. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellants’ brief in the above cause was due on April 12, 2012. On April 23,
2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and
that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response
has been received from appellants.
Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 7th day of June, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Javier De La Rosa Jr. v. State (Javier De La Rosa Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.