Javier Alonzo v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 20, 2020
Docket13-19-00337-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Javier Alonzo v. State (Javier Alonzo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Javier Alonzo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00337-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

JAVIER ALONZO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the honorable O. Rene Flores’ motion to

withdraw.

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel, if

any, rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.BHouston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s attorney should

remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to appointed

counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellant’s

current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order

to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name,

address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be

included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to be

included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or

before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

Appellant’s brief shall be due thirty days after the receipt of the supplemental

record.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 20th day of October, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. State
176 S.W.3d 249 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Javier Alonzo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/javier-alonzo-v-state-texapp-2020.