Javers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Javers v. State

750 So. 2d 161, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1025, 2000 WL 140220

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2000·No. No. 3D99-3077·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief made pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure as the issues raised in this motion are successive; see Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22, 24 (Fla.1986); Francois v. Wainwright, 470 So.2d 685, 686 (Fla.1985); Songer v. State, 463 So.2d 229, 231 (Fla.1985); and they should have or could have been raised by the appellant on direct appeal; see Johnston v. Dugger, 583 So.2d 657, 660 (Fla.1991); Kennedy v. State, 547 So.2d 912, 913 (Fla.1989).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief made pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure as the issues raised in this motion are successive; see Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22, 24 (Fla.1986); Francois v. Wainwright, 470 So.2d 685, 686 (Fla.1985); Songer v. State, 463 So.2d 229, 231 (Fla.1985); and they should have or could have been raised by the appellant on direct appeal; see Johnston v. Dugger, 583 So.2d 657, 660 (Fla.1991); Kennedy v. State, 547 So.2d 912, 913 (Fla.1989).

Affirmed.

Javers v. State, 750 So. 2d 161, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1025, 2000 WL 140220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

750 So. 2d 161 (Javers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related