J.A.T.T. Title Holding Corp. v. Roberts

371 S.E.2d 861, 258 Ga. 519, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 380
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 23, 1988·No. 45605·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Weltner, Justice.

We granted certiorari to determine whether the property owned by a non-profit corporation comes within the terms of the exemption set forth in OCGA § 48-5-41 (a) (6) for buildings erected for and used as a “seminary of learning.” Roberts v. J.A.T.T. Title Holding Corp., 185 Ga. App. 892 (366 SE2d 297) (1988).

The Mechanical Trades Institute is located on the property in question, and provides an apprenticeship program in the plumbing and steamfitting-pipefitting industry for persons with high school educations. The program consists of four years of educational training, including more than 800 hours of classroom instruction and almost 7,000 hours of practical training.

1. OCGA § 48-5-41 (a) (6) provides that “[a]ll buildings erected for and used as a college, incorporated academy, or other seminary of learning” are exempt from ad valorem property taxes, provided that they are open to the general public, and that they are “not. . . used for the purpose of producing private or corporate profit and income . . . and any income from such property shall be used exclusively for . . . educational . . . institutions.” See OCGA § 48-5-41 (b), (c), (d). This provision is consistent with the constitutional authorization. 1

*520 2. The term “seminary of learning” long has been construed to denote educational institutions in general. 2 The term appeared in Georgia law as early as the 1700’s, as a general reference to educational institutions, as here delineated:

(a) In 1783, the General Assembly authorized the commissioners of Augusta to lay out lots and resell them for the purpose of erecting an “academy or seminary of learning.” “And, whereas, a seminary of learning is greatly necessary for the instruction of our youth, and ought to be one of the first objects of attention, after the promotion of religion . . . .” Sec. 4, Act of July 31, 1783. Marbury and Crawford, p. 132.

(b) In 1784 the General Assembly enacted legislation for the endowment of a state university, which was to be a “College or seminary of learning.” Cobb’s Digest, p. 1082.

(c) The Constitution of Georgia of 1798 contained this provision: “The arts and sciences shall be promoted in one or more seminaries of learning. . . .” Art. 4, Sec. 13. Cobb’s Digest, p. 1125.

3. The term first was applied to tax exemptions in the 1870’s, when statewide public education was required in Georgia. The language employed was identical to that of the current statute and constitution. 3

4. The resolution of the tax exempt status of “buildings erected for and used as a college, incorporated academy, or other seminary of learning” has been determined by the use made of the property, and not by any specific definition of terms. Trustees of Richmond Academy v. Bohler, 80 Ga. 159, 163-4 (7 SE 633) (1887). 4 Thus while an *521 educational institution may be exempt, some of its grounds and buildings may be taxed if those grounds or buildings generate a private profit. Mundy v. Van Hoose, 104 Ga. 292 (30 SE 783) (1898); Rabun Gap-Nacoochee School v. Thomas, 228 Ga. 231 (184 SE2d 824) (1971). 5

Decided September 23, 1988. Elrod & Thompson, Randall A. Constantine, Jane E. Jordan, for appellant. Marva Jones Brooks, Jeff S. Klein, for appellees.

5. The term “seminary of learning,” as applied in its general meaning, does not exclude an institution such as the Mechanical Trades Institute. We decline to import into the meaning of the term any of the restrictions 6 suggested by the taxing authority. To do so would be unduly to enlarge upon constitutional and statutory pronouncements, and, worse, to convert the tax commissioner into the supervisor of curricula for every educational institution within the taxing jurisdiction.

6. The record does not show that the use made of the property by the Institute failed to comply with the constitutional and statutory requirements for exemption from taxation. The trial court’s order finding entitlement to the exemption was correct.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.A.T.T. Title Holding Corp. v. Roberts, 371 S.E.2d 861, 258 Ga. 519, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 380 (Ga. 1988).

371 S.E.2d 861 (J.A.T.T. Title Holding Corp. v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clayton County Board of Tax Assessors v. City of Atlanta
648 S.E.2d 701 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Atlanta Artists Center, Inc. v. Fulton County Board of Assessors
537 S.E.2d 701 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Department of Education v. Kitchens
387 S.E.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Roberts v. J.A.T.T. Title Holding Corp.
375 S.E.2d 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)