Jastro v. Francis

Supreme Court

Jastro v. Francis

249 U.S. 581, 39 S. Ct. 258

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 10, 1919·No. No. 606·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisc' tion [582] upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S., 216, 218.

Mr. Alonzo B. McMillen, Mr. Alexander Britton, Mr. Evans Browne and Mr. F. W. Clements for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Bernard S. Rodey for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisc' tion [582] upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S., 216, 218.

Mr. Alonzo B. McMillen, Mr. Alexander Britton, Mr. Evans Browne and Mr. F. W. Clements for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Bernard S. Rodey for defendants in error.

Jastro v. Francis, 249 U.S. 581, 39 S. Ct. 258 (1919).

Pincite

249 U.S. 581 (Jastro v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related