Home/Supreme Court/Jastro v. Francis

Jastro v. Francis

249 U.S. 581, 39 S. Ct. 258
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 10, 1919
DocketNo. 606
StatusPublished

This text of 249 U.S. 581 (Jastro v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jastro v. Francis, 249 U.S. 581, 39 S. Ct. 258 (1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisc' tion [582]*582upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S., 216, 218.

Mr. Alonzo B. McMillen, Mr. Alexander Britton, Mr. Evans Browne and Mr. F. W. Clements for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Bernard S. Rodey for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
205 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 U.S. 581, 39 S. Ct. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jastro-v-francis-scotus-1919.