Jassal v. Jain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jassal v. Jain

193 A.D.2d 649, 598 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4703

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 649 (Jassal v. Jain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jassal v. Jain, 193 A.D.2d 649, 598 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, Lalit K. Jain and Abha Jain appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Zeck, J.H.O.), dated September 7, 1990, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, denied them recovery on their cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract against Harjit Jassal and Ray Avellino, awarded both Harjit Jassal and Ray Avellino damages in quantum meruit, and awarded Tensel Heating Co., Inc., damages for services performed and materials supplied.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

This case concerns lawsuits between the owner, architect and contractors involved in the design and partial construction of a custom private home in Irvington, New York. After a nonjury trial, the issues were resolved largely against the owners of the partially constructed home, Lalit K. Jain and Abha Jain. The appellants’ contentions that the Judicial Hearing Officer committed errors of law and fact warranting reversal are without merit (see, Kaiser v Fishman, 187 AD2d 623; Clancy v County of Nassau, 142 AD2d 626). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, Lalit K. Jain and Abha Jain appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Zeck, J.H.O.), dated September 7, 1990, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, denied them recovery on their cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract against Harjit Jassal and Ray Avellino, awarded both Harjit Jassal and Ray Avellino damages in quantum meruit, and awarded Tensel Heating Co., Inc., damages for services performed and materials supplied.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

This case concerns lawsuits between the owner, architect and contractors involved in the design and partial construction of a custom private home in Irvington, New York. After a nonjury trial, the issues were resolved largely against the owners of the partially constructed home, Lalit K. Jain and Abha Jain. The appellants’ contentions that the Judicial Hearing Officer committed errors of law and fact warranting reversal are without merit (see, Kaiser v Fishman, 187 AD2d 623; Clancy v County of Nassau, 142 AD2d 626). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 649, 598 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jassal-v-jain-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack