Jasper Land Co. v. Riddlesperger

Alabama Court of Appeals

Jasper Land Co. v. Riddlesperger

140 So. 624, 25 Ala. App. 45, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 59

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 22, 1932

Docket6 Div. 215.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 140 So. 624 (Jasper Land Co. v. Riddlesperger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jasper Land Co. v. Riddlesperger, 140 So. 624, 25 Ala. App. 45, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 59 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

“A judgment should be complete and certain in itself.” Sugar Valley Land Co. et al. v. Johnson, 17 Ala. App. 409, 85 So. 871, 874, and authorities cited in the opinion in that ease.

The judgment rendered in this case violates the above rule, and, ■ for that reason, must be reversed.

As the ease must be retried, and the evidence may be supplemented, we deem it profit *46 less to undertake to' decide whether or not, upon the evidence in the hill of exceptions, judgment in favor of appellee was warranted.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI