JASPER COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS v. Solomon

674 S.E.2d 668, 296 Ga. App. 441, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 920, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 239
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 5, 2009
DocketA08A1763
StatusPublished

This text of 674 S.E.2d 668 (JASPER COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JASPER COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS v. Solomon, 674 S.E.2d 668, 296 Ga. App. 441, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 920, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 239 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

The Jasper County Board of Tax Assessors appeals from the trial court’s order concluding that it improperly disallowed Judy Solomon’s claim for a conservation use assessment under OCGA § 48-5-7.4 (b) (5). Based on this court’s recent opinion in Morrison v. Claborn, 294 Ga. App. 508 (669 SE2d 492) (2008), we reverse.

In Morrison, supra, we decided the identical issue now before us: whether property can qualify as bona fide conservation use property under OCGA § 48-5-7.4 (b) (5) when restrictive covenants prevent the property owner from conducting some, but not all, of the activities described in OCGA § 48-5-7.4 (a) (1) (E). We concluded in Morrison that this type of property does not qualify as bona fide conservation use property. As a result, we reverse the trial court’s order reaching a contrary conclusion.

Judgment reversed.

Mikell and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrison v. Claborn
669 S.E.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 S.E.2d 668, 296 Ga. App. 441, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 920, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jasper-county-board-of-tax-assessors-v-solomon-gactapp-2009.