Jasper & Chicago Motor Express, Inc. v. Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc.
This text of 175 N.E.2d 20 (Jasper & Chicago Motor Express, Inc. v. Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
The appellant has petitioned this court for a transfer from the Appellate Court. (See opinion reported in 182 Ind. App. —, 172 N. E. 2d 586.)
We disapprove the statement in the opinion of the Appellate Court to the effect that the failure to name a party in the assignment of errors is jurisdictional,
Rule 2-6 provides specifically that:
. . Failure properly to name parties will not be treated as jurisdictional. Amendments may be permitted upon such terms as the court shall direct.”
However, transfer is denied on the ground that after the appellant’s attention was called to the defect in the parties named in the assignment of errors, no application or attempt was made to amend, as provided in the above quoted rule.
The petition to transfer is denied.
Note. — Reported in 175 N. E. 2d 20.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 N.E.2d 20, 241 Ind. 643, 1961 Ind. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jasper-chicago-motor-express-inc-v-ziffrin-truck-lines-inc-ind-1961.