Jaspan, Ginsberg, Ehrlich, Schlesinger & Hoffman v. Ehrlich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jaspan, Ginsberg, Ehrlich, Schlesinger & Hoffman v. Ehrlich

188 A.D.2d 585, 592 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14486

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1992·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover unpaid legal fees, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated May 23, 1990, which was in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $17,116.42.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in failing to vacate an order of preclusion (see, Hoffman v Sno Haus Ski Shops, 185 AD2d 874) or in granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover unpaid legal fees, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated May 23, 1990, which was in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $17,116.42.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in failing to vacate an order of preclusion (see, Hoffman v Sno Haus Ski Shops, 185 AD2d 874) or in granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Jaspan, Ginsberg, Ehrlich, Schlesinger & Hoffman v. Ehrlich, 188 A.D.2d 585, 592 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

188 A.D.2d 585 (Jaspan, Ginsberg, Ehrlich, Schlesinger & Hoffman v. Ehrlich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related