Jason Woody Clark v. the State of Texas
This text of Jason Woody Clark v. the State of Texas (Jason Woody Clark v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00223-CR
JASON WOODY CLARK, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 31st District Court Wheeler County, Texas Trial Court No. 5613, Honorable Steven R. Emmert, Presiding
July 27, 2023 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Jason Woody Clark, is under indictment for aggravated assault on a
public servant.1 Appellant filed a notice of appeal, pro se, from the trial court’s purported
order declaring him incompetent to stand trial and from an order permitting his appointed
counsel to withdraw. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(b)(2)(B). We have jurisdiction in a criminal case to consider an appeal from a judgment of
guilt or where jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. See Abbott v. State, 271
S.W.3d 694, 697–98 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). An order declaring a defendant incompetent
to stand trial or permitting a defendant’s counsel to withdraw is neither a judgment of guilt
nor an appealable order. See Grant v. State, No. 01-21-00340-CR, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS
8307, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 14, 2021, pet. ref’d) (per curiam) (mem.
op., not designated for publication) (finding no interlocutory appeal from an order
declaring appellant incompetent to stand trial); Webb v. State, No. 13-13-00075-CR, 2013
Tex. App. LEXIS 5082, at *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Apr. 25, 2013, no pet.) (per
curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (finding no interlocutory appeal from
an order permitting counsel to withdraw).
By letter of July 11, 2023, we directed Appellant to show how we have jurisdiction
over this appeal. Appellant filed a response but failed to show grounds for continuing the
appeal.
Because Appellant has not presented this Court with a judgment or appealable
order, we dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jason Woody Clark v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-woody-clark-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.