Jason William Brokken v. Kathleen Allison

Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-01526-RGK-SK Document 2 Filed 08/29/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:99

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON WILLIAM BROKKEN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01084-EPG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA v.

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Respondents.

Petitioner Jason William Brokken is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. When a state prisoner files a habeas petition in a state that contains two or more federal judicial districts, the petition may be filed in either the judicial district in which the petitioner is presently confined or the judicial district in which he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (quoting Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S. Ct. 338, 5 L. Ed. 2d 329 (1961)). Petitions challenging the execution of a sentence are preferably heard in the district where the inmate is confined. See Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitions challenging convictions or sentences are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Section 2241 further states that, rather than dismissing an improperly filed action, a district court, “in the exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice[,] may 1 Case 5:22-cv-01526-RGK-SK Document 2 Filed 08/29/22 Page 2of2 Page ID#:100

transfer” the habeas petition to another federal district for hearing and determination. Id.; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (court may transfer any civil action “to any other district or division where it might have been brought” for convenience of parties or “in the interest of justice”). Here, Petitioner is challenging his criminal conviction in the Riverside County Superior Court, and thus, the petition is preferably heard in the district of conviction, which is the Central District of California. Therefore, this action will be transferred. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 11} Dated: _ August 29, 2022 [sf ey — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE