Jason v. . Ayliff

Court of King's Bench

Jason v. . Ayliff

1 N.C. 710

DecidedJuly 5, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 710 (Jason v. . Ayliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jason v. . Ayliff, 1 N.C. 710 (kingsbench 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

Jermyn moved the court they would give the plaintiff a day to show cause why he should not acknowledge satisfaction of a judgment he had obtained against the defendant, he having received the money and promised to acknowledge satisfaction, and an affidavit being made thereof. Ayliff was ready to release errors and the court granted the motion. *Page 711 Nota. On all allowance of an audita quaerela, it was said by Brown, secondary, that in an audita quaerela bail shall be put in court before the Judges themselves. Palm., 422.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jermyn moved the court they would give the plaintiff a day to show cause why he should not acknowledge satisfaction of a judgment he had obtained against the defendant, he having received the money and promised to acknowledge satisfaction, and an affidavit being made thereof. Ayliff was ready to release errors and the court granted the motion. *Page 711 Nota. On all allowance of an audita quaerela, it was said by Brown, secondary, that in an audita quaerela bail shall be put in court before the Judges themselves. Palm., 422.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-v-ayliff-kingsbench-1793.