Jason Thomas Cryer v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 27, 2005
Docket14-05-01033-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jason Thomas Cryer v. State (Jason Thomas Cryer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jason Thomas Cryer v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 27, 2005

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 27, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-01033-CR

NO. 14-05-01034-CR

JASON THOMAS CRYER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1032254 & 1032687

________________________________________________________________

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N


Appellant entered a guilty plea to felony theft in cause number 1032254.  Appellant also entered a guilty plea to burglary of a habitation with intent to commit theft in cause number 1032687.  In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant in each case on August 26, 2005, to confinement for three years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, with the sentences to be served concurrently.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in each case.[1]  Because appellant has no right to appeal, we dismiss. 

In each case, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant=s right to appeal in which the court certified that each is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The trial court=s certifications are included in the records on appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. 

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed October 27, 2005.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



[1]  The printed form notices of appeal in our records are not signed by appellant.  The notices are dated, signed by the trial judge, and file-stamped by the district clerk, however.  In view of our disposition of these appeals, we need not address the sufficiency of appellant=s notices of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c) (requiring notice of appeal to be in writing, filed with the trial court clerk, and show the defendant=s desire to appeal).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jason Thomas Cryer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-thomas-cryer-v-state-texapp-2005.