Jason Thomas Cryer v. State
This text of Jason Thomas Cryer v. State (Jason Thomas Cryer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 27, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-01033-CR
NO. 14-05-01034-CR
JASON THOMAS CRYER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 178th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 1032254 & 1032687
________________________________________________________________
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a guilty plea to felony theft in cause number 1032254. Appellant also entered a guilty plea to burglary of a habitation with intent to commit theft in cause number 1032687. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant in each case on August 26, 2005, to confinement for three years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, with the sentences to be served concurrently. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in each case.[1] Because appellant has no right to appeal, we dismiss.
In each case, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant=s right to appeal in which the court certified that each is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court=s certifications are included in the records on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed October 27, 2005.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
[1] The printed form notices of appeal in our records are not signed by appellant. The notices are dated, signed by the trial judge, and file-stamped by the district clerk, however. In view of our disposition of these appeals, we need not address the sufficiency of appellant=s notices of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c) (requiring notice of appeal to be in writing, filed with the trial court clerk, and show the defendant=s desire to appeal).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jason Thomas Cryer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-thomas-cryer-v-state-texapp-2005.