Jason Smart-El v.

599 F. App'x 423
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 14, 2015
Docket15-1111
StatusUnpublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 423 (Jason Smart-El v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jason Smart-El v., 599 F. App'x 423 (3d Cir. 2015).

Opinion

OPINION *

PER CURIAM.

Jason Emanuel Smart-El filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on a motion that he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court has since granted Smart-El’s § 2255 motion. In light of the District Court’s action, -the question Smart-El presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will dismiss the petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1992); see also Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir.1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiffs personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”)

*

This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corporation
77 F.3d 690 (Third Circuit, 1996)
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
975 F.2d 964 (Third Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 F. App'x 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-smart-el-v-ca3-2015.