Jason Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Jason Robinson v. State

DecidedApril 7, 2016

Docket01-15-00809-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Jason Robinson v. State (Jason Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jason Robinson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS Cause number: 01-15-00808-CR & 01-15-00809-CR Style: Jason Robinson v. The State of Texas Date motions filed*: April 4, 2016 Type of motion: Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motions: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time: Original due date: February 4, 2016 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due Date: April 7, 2016 Date Requested: May 7, 2016 (93 days from original due date)

Ordered that motions are:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: May 9, 2016.  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Because appellant’s counsel states that she needs additional time to file appellant’s brief in this appeal since, among several other briefs she has been preparing, she had missed a week of work due to a medical emergency with her husband, her third extension is granted, but counsel is warned that no further extensions will be granted given the length of the extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38.6(d). Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not filed by May 9, 2016, the Court may abate this appeal for a late-brief hearing. See id. 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually

Date: April 7, 2016

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS Cause number: 01-15-00808-CR & 01-15-00809-CR Style: Jason Robinson v. The State of Texas Date motions filed*: April 4, 2016 Type of motion: Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motions: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time: Original due date: February 4, 2016 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due Date: April 7, 2016 Date Requested: May 7, 2016 (93 days from original due date)

Ordered that motions are:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: May 9, 2016.  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Because appellant’s counsel states that she needs additional time to file appellant’s brief in this appeal since, among several other briefs she has been preparing, she had missed a week of work due to a medical emergency with her husband, her third extension is granted, but counsel is warned that no further extensions will be granted given the length of the extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38.6(d). Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not filed by May 9, 2016, the Court may abate this appeal for a late-brief hearing. See id. 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually

Date: April 7, 2016

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jason Robinson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-robinson-v-state-texapp-2016.