Jason Ray Brannon A/K/A Michael Earl Short v. Harris County

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 25, 2011
Docket14-11-00529-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jason Ray Brannon A/K/A Michael Earl Short v. Harris County (Jason Ray Brannon A/K/A Michael Earl Short v. Harris County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jason Ray Brannon A/K/A Michael Earl Short v. Harris County, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 25, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00529-CV

JASON RAY BRANNON A/K/A MICHAEL EARL SHORT, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-21469

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

On February 28, 2011, appellant filed a pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis, asserting his inability to pay filing fees and costs for service of his petition for expunction of his criminal record.  On May 16, 2011, the trial court signed an order sustaining Harris County’s contest to appellant’s affidavit of inability to pay court costs.  On June 14, 2011, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from that order. 

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments.  Lehmann v. Har‑Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).  Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if permitted by statute.  Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). 

On July 21, 2011, this court advised the parties that it appeared that this court lacked jurisdiction over this attempted appeal, and we ordered a partial clerk’s record so that we could determine our jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  The record was filed on August 15, 2011, and it contains no final, appealable order.  The record reveals that no judgment has been signed, and the suit remains pending.  The trial court’s order sustaining the contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence is an interlocutory order that is not subject to appeal.  Therefore, we are without jurisdiction over this appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson
53 S.W.3d 352 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps
842 S.W.2d 266 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jason Ray Brannon A/K/A Michael Earl Short v. Harris County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-ray-brannon-aka-michael-earl-short-v-harris--texapp-2011.