Jason Jensen v. Citibank, N.A.
This text of Jason Jensen v. Citibank, N.A. (Jason Jensen v. Citibank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-1596 ___________________________
Jason Adam Jensen
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Citibank, N.A., a Corporation; Citigroup Inc., A Delaware Corporation; JH Met Subsidiary B. Liquidating Trust, A Legal Trust Type Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
David R. Gamache, individual capacity as an attorney; State of Missouri; Chief Justice Paul C. Wilson, in his official capacity as Courts Administrator; Missouri Office of Court Administration, a State entity; Kathy Lloyd, official capacity as State Court Administrator
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
Stone County, Missouri, a State entity; Mechelle Lebow, official capacity as Stone County Court Clerk; In Re Judge Alan Mark Blankenship, in his Exercise of Judgment of Federal Law capacity; Judge David A. Cole, official administrative capacity as Presiding Judge of Stone County; Sheriff Doug Radar, official capacity Stone County Sheriff
Gamache & Myers, P.C.; Frankel, Rubin, Klein, Payne, Pudlowski, P.C.; Esq. Mayer Simcha Klein
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri ____________
Submitted: October 3, 2024 Filed: October 11, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRASZ, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Jason Jensen appeals following the district court’s1 denial of in forma pauperis status and dismissal of his pro se action. After careful de novo review of the record, the parties’ submissions on appeal, and the issues properly before us, we find no basis for reversal. See Nerness v. Johnson, 401 F.3d 874, 875 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review for denial of in forma pauperis status); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review for dismissal of pre-service claims); Chase v. Andeavor Logistics, L.P., 12 F.4th 864, 868 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review for dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12). Accordingly, we affirm. Additionally, Jensen’s Supplemental Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on October 6, 2024 and the remaining pending motions are denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jason Jensen v. Citibank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-jensen-v-citibank-na-ca8-2024.