Jason Holland v. State of Florida

191 So. 3d 942, 2016 WL 2731664, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7175
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 11, 2016
Docket4D16-253
StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 3d 942 (Jason Holland v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jason Holland v. State of Florida, 191 So. 3d 942, 2016 WL 2731664, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7175 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason Holland appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was treated as a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no error in the trial court’s denial of the petition as untimely and impermissibly successive. However, the court’s order mistakenly refers to a previous rule 3.850 motion filed in February 2013 instead of this habeas petition filed in April 2015. On remand, the trial court is instructed to amend its order to-refer to the correct pleading.

Affirmed and Remanded with instructions,

STEVENSON, GROSS and ■ KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 3d 942, 2016 WL 2731664, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-holland-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.