Jason Garmon v. Meagan Garmon

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: May 1, 2026
• Docket: 6D2024-1564
• Status: Published

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 6D2024-1564 Lower Tribunal No. 2018-DR-006333 _____________________________

JASON GARMON,

Appellant,

v.

MEAGAN GARMON,

Appellee. _____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. Elaine A. Barbour, Judge.

May 1, 2026

MARLEWSKI, C.A., Associate Judge.

Former Husband, Jason Garmon, appeals an order awarding attorney’s fees to

his Former Wife, Meagan Garmon, in an underlying post-dissolution of marriage

proceeding as well as the order denying his request for a rehearing on the fees

motion. Former Husband argued for the first time in his motion for rehearing that

Former Wife failed to prove her need for attorney’s fees by competent substantial evidence which should result in the reversal of the court’s order granting fees. 1 We

agree. Because the record lacks competent substantial evidence to support Former

Wife’s need for attorney’s fees, we reverse the award. See Saporito v. Saporito, 831

So. 2d 697, 701 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697, 699 (Fla.

1997); Broemer v. Broemer, 109 So. 3d 284, 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Lau v. Lau,

407 So. 2d 927, 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Zahringer v. Zahringer, 813 So. 2d 454,

457 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bohner v. Bohner, 997 So. 2d 454, 457 (Fla. 4th DCA

2008); Bauchman v. Bauchman, 253 So. 3d 1143, 1148-49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018);

Graydus v. Graydus, 414 So. 3d 213, 215 (Fla 4th DCA 2025); Carlson v. Carlson,

719 So. 2d 936, 936 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

REVERSED.

STARGEL and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Allison M. Perry, of Florida Appeals, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Wade P. Luther, of The Law Office of Wade P. Luther, P.A., Montverde, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

1 A party may raise sufficiency of the evidence for the first time on appeal even if not raised in a motion for rehearing. See Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.530(e) (“When an action has been tried by the court without a jury, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment may be raised on appeal whether or not the party raising the question has made any objection to it in the trial court or made a motion for rehearing, for new trial, or to alter or amend the judgment.”).