Jason David Pavy v. State
This text of Jason David Pavy v. State (Jason David Pavy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-01-00466-CR
Jason David Pavy, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 51,608, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM
Appellant Jason David Pavy pleaded guilty to a three-count indictment accusing him
of aggravated robbery, aggravated kidnaping, and engaging in organized criminal activity. The court
adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment for each count at imprisonment for fifteen years, as
called for in a plea bargain agreement.
The clerk’s record contains a written waiver of appeal signed by appellant, his
attorney, and the trial judge. A defendant who knowingly and intelligently waives his right to appeal
may not thereafter appeal without the consent of the trial court. Ex parte Dickey, 543 S.W.2d 99
(Tex. Crim. App. 1976); see also Hurd v. State, 548 S.W.2d 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Reed v.
State, 516 S.W.2d 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). In addition, appellant’s general notice of appeal does
not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(b)(3) and fails to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Whitt v. State, 45 S.W.3d 274, 275 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.); see also Cooper v.
State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 80-81 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: September 13, 2001
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jason David Pavy v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-david-pavy-v-state-texapp-2001.