Jason Aaron Gregory v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 17, 2003
Docket11-03-00023-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jason Aaron Gregory v. State (Jason Aaron Gregory v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jason Aaron Gregory v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

                                                             11th Court of Appeals

                                                                  Eastland, Texas

                                                                        Opinion

Jason Aaron Gregory

Appellant

Vs.                   No. 11-03-00023-CR - Appeal from Collin County

State of Texas

Appellee

The trial court convicted Jason Aaron Gregory, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual assault of a child.  Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement for four years.  We dismiss the appeal.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which counsel states that, after diligently searching the record and the applicable law, the record reflects no reversible error.  Counsel has furnished appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of his right to review the record and file a pro se brief.  A pro se brief has not been filed.  Counsel has complied with the procedures outlined in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Cr.App.1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969).

Counsel points out that appellant’s pro se “general” notice of appeal does not meet the requirements of TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2.  We agree.  We further note that the notice of appeal has not been amended.  Rule 25.2(f); Bayless v. State, 91 S.W.3d 801 (Tex.Cr.App.2002).   

The appeal is dismissed.  Woods v. State, No. 2365-01, 2003 WL 21398613 (Tex.Cr.App. June 18, 2003); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77 (Tex.Cr.App.2001); Whitfield v. State, No. 11-02-00187-CR, 2003 WL 21512625 (Tex.App. - Eastland July 3, 2003, no pet’n h.).

July 17, 2003                                                                           PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of:  Arnot, C.J., and

Wright, J., and McCall, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Woods v. State
108 S.W.3d 314 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Stafford v. State
813 S.W.2d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Cooper v. State
45 S.W.3d 77 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Bayless v. State
91 S.W.3d 801 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Whitfield v. State
111 S.W.3d 786 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Currie v. State
516 S.W.2d 684 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jason Aaron Gregory v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-aaron-gregory-v-state-texapp-2003.