Jasmyne LaMarque Vaughn v. State

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 29, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00650-CR NO. 14-19-00651-CR

JASMYNE LAMARQUE VAUGHN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1590390 and 1590391

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Jasmyne Lamarque Vaughn appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled substance. Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.115(d). Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

2

807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of his right to inspect the appellate records and file a pro se response to the brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel’s brief and agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the records. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the trial court’s judgments are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Bourliot.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).