Home/California Supreme Court/Jasmine Networks v. SEMICONDUCTOR

Jasmine Networks v. SEMICONDUCTOR

94 P.3d 475, 16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 330, 2004 D.A.R. 8890, 2004 Daily Journal DAR 8890, 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6536, 2004 Cal. LEXIS 6632
California Supreme Court·Decided July 21, 2004·No. S124914·Published

Opinion

16 Cal.Rptr.3d 330 (2005)
94 P.3d 475

JASMINE NETWORKS
v.
MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR.

No. S124914.

Supreme Court of California.

July 21, 2004.

Julian William Mack, Buchalter Nemer et al., San Francisco, CA, David J. Rude, Clark & Rude LLP, San Jose, CA, for Defendants and Respondents.

James McManis, Jessica Irene Valenzuela Santamaria, McManis Faulkner & Morgan, San Jose, CA, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Review granted/briefing deferred (rule 29.1).

Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Rico v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp., S123808 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28.2(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.1, is deferred pending further order of the court.

GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jasmine Networks v. SEMICONDUCTOR, 94 P.3d 475, 16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 330, 2004 D.A.R. 8890, 2004 Daily Journal DAR 8890, 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6536, 2004 Cal. LEXIS 6632 (Cal. 2004).

94 P.3d 475 (Jasmine Networks v. SEMICONDUCTOR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.