Jasmine Charmaine Herndon v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 13, 2012
Docket03-11-00030-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jasmine Charmaine Herndon v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Jasmine Charmaine Herndon v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jasmine Charmaine Herndon v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00030-CV

Jasmine Charmaine Herndon, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-08-006268, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After appellant filed her notice of appeal, the clerk’s record was filed in this

Court on January 7, 2011, and the reporter’s record was filed on February 10, 2011. Appellant’s

appointed counsel filed and was granted two motions for extension of time to file the brief, but

on April 4, 2011, the trial court signed an order allowing counsel to withdraw from the case.

After appellant failed to respond to our notices related to the cause, we abated the appeal, asking

the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether appellant still wished to pursue the appeal,

whether she was indigent, and whether new appellate counsel should be appointed. See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.8(a)(2); In re T.V., 8 S.W.3d 448, 449-50 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, order) (holding

that to adequately protect indigent parent’s rights in termination case, court should abate appeal

to allow trial court to hold hearing to determine issues raised in Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)); see also

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). The court has provided a supplemental clerk’s record containing an order signed after

the requested hearing. The court determined that appellant had abandoned her appeal and found that

it was not necessary to appoint new appellate counsel and that appellant had not brought forth any

evidence to prove she was indigent. The trial court recommended that the appeal be dismissed.

Appellant has not filed any kind of response to the supplemental clerk’s record or to

any of our notices, dating back to July 2011. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Henson and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 13, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of T.V.
8 S.W.3d 448 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jasmine Charmaine Herndon v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jasmine-charmaine-herndon-v-texas-department-of-fa-texapp-2012.