Jasmann v. State

2017 ND 150, 897 N.W.2d 326, 2017 WL 2807362, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 153
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided June 29, 2017·No. 20160396·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Matthew Jasmann appealed from the district court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief. In his application, Jasmann argued: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) the State failed to obtain evidence which was exculpatory in nature, and (3) the State’s actions during trial amounted to prosecu-torial misconduct. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2), (7). State v. Steffes, 500 N.W.2d 608, 612 (N.D. 1993) (“Police generally have no duty to collect evidence for the defense.”).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jasmann v. State, 2017 ND 150, 897 N.W.2d 326, 2017 WL 2807362, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 153 (N.D. 2017).

2017 ND 150 (Jasmann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Steffes
500 N.W.2d 608 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1993)