Jasmann v. State

2017 ND 150, 897 N.W.2d 326, 2017 WL 2807362, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 153
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJune 29, 2017
Docket20160396
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 150 (Jasmann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jasmann v. State, 2017 ND 150, 897 N.W.2d 326, 2017 WL 2807362, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 153 (N.D. 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Matthew Jasmann appealed from the district court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief. In his application, Jasmann argued: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) the State failed to obtain evidence which was exculpatory in nature, and (3) the State’s actions during trial amounted to prosecu-torial misconduct. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2), (7). State v. Steffes, 500 N.W.2d 608, 612 (N.D. 1993) (“Police generally have no duty to collect evidence for the defense.”).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Steffes
500 N.W.2d 608 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 ND 150, 897 N.W.2d 326, 2017 WL 2807362, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jasmann-v-state-nd-2017.