Jasmann v. State
This text of 2017 ND 150 (Jasmann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[¶ 1] Matthew Jasmann appealed from the district court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief. In his application, Jasmann argued: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) the State failed to obtain evidence which was exculpatory in nature, and (3) the State’s actions during trial amounted to prosecu-torial misconduct. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2), (7). State v. Steffes, 500 N.W.2d 608, 612 (N.D. 1993) (“Police generally have no duty to collect evidence for the defense.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 150, 897 N.W.2d 326, 2017 WL 2807362, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jasmann-v-state-nd-2017.