Jaske v. Hanks

27 F. App'x 622
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided October 17, 2001·No. No. 00-3268·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Indiana prisoner Roger Jaske was convicted of homicide in a prison disciplinary proceeding and sentenced to three years’ disciplinary segregation. Mr. Jaske challenged the determination under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and the district court dismissed his petition. Because disciplinary segregation affects the severity rather than the duration of custody, Mr. Jaske’s petition was improperly brought under § 2254. See Montgomery v. Anderson, 262 F.3d 641, 643-44 (7th Cir.2001). See also Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 630 n. 3 (7th Cir. 2000) (expressing doubt that habeas corpus is appropriate procedure for challenging segregation); Moran v. Sondalle, 218 F.3d 647, 650-51 (7th Cir.2000) (state prisoners challenging administrative segregation must use § 1983, not § 2254); Sylvester v. Hanks, 140 F.3d 713, 714 (7th Cir. 1998) (expressing doubt that challenge to 3 years’ disciplinary segregation should proceed under § 2254). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaske v. Hanks, 27 F. App'x 622 (7th Cir. 2001).

27 F. App'x 622 (Jaske v. Hanks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
N.D. Indiana, 2026
Untitled Case
N.D. Indiana, 2026
Gregory A. Taylor v. Warden
N.D. Indiana, 2025
Johnson v. Warden
N.D. Indiana, 2024
Abdul Mateen v. Warden
N.D. Indiana, 2024
Scruggs v. Warden
N.D. Indiana, 2024