Jasie v. Greenwich Village Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jasie v. Greenwich Village Development Corp.

247 A.D. 350, 287 N.Y.S. 425, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8260

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 350 (Jasie v. Greenwich Village Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jasie v. Greenwich Village Development Corp., 247 A.D. 350, 287 N.Y.S. 425, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court did not appoint a referee to compute, but did appoint a referee to report on an issue of fact, viz., whether [351]*351plaintiffs or William Jasie, their agent, after paying all charges as provided for in the agreement and assignment of rents, of August 1, 1933, did not, on or about April 18, 1935, have sufficient money left to pay plaintiffs the interest then due them on the bond and mortgage under foreclosure. This was not authorized. The order, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion of the plaintiffs for summary judgment denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Order so far as appealed from unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The court did not appoint a referee to compute, but did appoint a referee to report on an issue of fact, viz., whether [351]*351plaintiffs or William Jasie, their agent, after paying all charges as provided for in the agreement and assignment of rents, of August 1, 1933, did not, on or about April 18, 1935, have sufficient money left to pay plaintiffs the interest then due them on the bond and mortgage under foreclosure. This was not authorized. The order, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion of the plaintiffs for summary judgment denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Order so far as appealed from unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 350, 287 N.Y.S. 425, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jasie-v-greenwich-village-development-corp-nyappdiv-1936.