Jasenzak v. Schipp

278 A.D. 660, 102 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4259
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, as a result of the negligent repair of a chimney flue, in that it was blocked and caused an accumulation of poisonous gases, order granting respondent’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to him, and the judgment entered thereon, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion, under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, denied, without costs. The complaint sufficiently alleges affirmative negligence for which the contractor may be liable, notwithstanding that the injuries were not those of the contractee. (Brown v. Welsbaeh Gorp., 301 N. Y. 202; Adams V. White Gonstr. Co., 299 N. Y. 641.) Nolan, P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jasenzak v. Schipp, 278 A.D. 660, 102 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 660 (Jasenzak v. Schipp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.
218 N.E.2d 661 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)