Jase Marcellus Mondy, etc v. Commonwealth
This text of Jase Marcellus Mondy, etc v. Commonwealth (Jase Marcellus Mondy, etc v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Willis, Bray and Retired Judge Whitehurst * Argued at Norfolk, Virginia
JASE MARCELLUS MONDY, S/K/A JACE M. MONDY
v. Record No. 1642-93-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION** BY JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JUNE 20, 1995
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE E. Preston Grissom, Judge David W. Bouchard (Bouchard & Smith, on brief), for appellant.
Donald R. Curry, Senior Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.
On appeal from his convictions of first degree murder and
use of a firearm in the commission of a murder, Jase Marcellus
Mondy contends that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of
law to support his convictions.
"When considering the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal
of a criminal conviction, we must view all the evidence in the
light most favorable to the Commonwealth and accord to the
evidence all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom." Traverso v. Commonwealth, 6 Va. App. 172, 176, 366 S.E.2d 719,
721 (1988) (citations omitted). "The jury's verdict will not be * Retired Judge Alfred W. Whitehurst took part in the consideration of this case by designation pursuant to Code § 17-116.01. ** Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. disturbed on appeal unless it is plainly wrong or without
evidence to support it." Id.
Steven Love, the victim, was a known drug dealer and Mondy
was his bodyguard. On September 9, 1991, Love's body was found
in an empty house located at 2212 Berkeley Avenue in Chesapeake.
Mondy had spent several nights at that house between July and
August of 1991. Mondy's clothes were found strewn on the floor
around Love's body. Love's death occurred sometime between 8:00 p.m. on
September 8th and 11:30 a.m. on September 9th. He was last seen
alive on September 8 at about 7:30 p.m. by Kenneth Brown, his
roommate. He was then going out with Mondy to do a "gun
transaction." He was carrying between $4,000 and $5,000 in cash
and one-half ounce of cocaine. Neither the money nor the cocaine
was on Love's body when he was found.
Brown testified that he saw Mondy an hour later, but Love
was not with him. Mondy told Brown that Love was with his
girlfriend, Sherrie Cook. Ms. Cook testified that she last saw
Love on September 7.
On September 8, Latyna Williams and Sean Sweat were to drive
to North Carolina with Mondy. They were unable to contact him on
his beeper from 8:30 p.m. until midnight. Ms. Williams testified
that when they finally met him, he was carrying the brown leather
book bag in which she knew he carried his .380 caliber handgun.
Before leaving Chesapeake, the three of them drove to the
- 2 - neighborhood where Love's body was found the next day. Mondy and
Sweat got out of the car and were gone twenty minutes.
The cause of Love's death was a "gunshot wound to the back
of the head." The bullet was fired from a .380 caliber handgun.
Several witnesses testified that Mondy owned a .380. When Mondy
was arrested a month later in North Carolina, he was in
possession of the murder weapon.
Mondy contends that the evidence is insufficient to support
his convictions. He argues that because the evidence is entirely
circumstantial, "to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt all
the necessary circumstances proved must be consistent with guilt
and inconsistent with innocence." Harrell v. Commonwealth, 11
Va. App. 1, 9, 396 S.E.2d 680, 684 (1990). He argues that the
evidence does not exclude the possibility that a third party
killed Love. However, no evidence supports this hypothesis.
"The Commonwealth need only exclude reasonable hypotheses of
innocence that flow from the evidence, not those that spring from
the imagination of the defendant." Hollins v. Commonwealth, 19
Va. App. 223, 229, 450 S.E.2d 397, 400 (1994) (quoting Hamilton
v. Commonwealth, 16 Va. App. 751, 755, 433 S.E.2d 27, 29 (1993)
(citations omitted)).
Mondy was with Love on the night of the murder. Mondy knew
that Love was a drug dealer and that he carried large sums of
money and drugs. Mondy had stayed previously at the house where
Love's body was found. Love was killed with a .380 caliber
- 3 - handgun, a type owned by Mondy and in his possession on the night
of the murder. Mondy was in possession of the murder weapon when
he was arrested. See Schlimme v. Commonwealth, 16 Va. App. 15,
21, 427 S.E.2d 431, 435 (1993) (sufficient evidence of criminal
agency where defendant found in possession of gun five months
after offense).
No evidence suggests that another person killed Love. "It
has been stated that in cases involving circumstantial evidence . . . '[w]here all the circumstances of time, place, motive,
means, opportunity, and conduct concur in pointing out the
accused as the perpetrator of the crime . . . the evidence is
powerfully strengthened by the total absence of any trace or
vestige of any other agent.'" Hall v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App.
671, 674, 347 S.E.2d 193, 194 (1986) (quoting Lyons v. City of
Petersburg, 221 Va. 10, 13, 266 S.E.2d 880, 881 (1980)).
We find the evidence sufficient to support Mondy's
convictions and affirm the judgments of the trial court. Affirmed.
- 4 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jase Marcellus Mondy, etc v. Commonwealth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jase-marcellus-mondy-etc-v-commonwealth-vactapp-1995.